Search found 389 matches
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 3:49 am
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
- Replies: 15
- Views: 18101
Re: NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
Regarding: If you write DELETE OnlineMeetingAttendees.Attendee what you are actually doing is DELETE Member (ie the instance of Member) as OnlineMeetingAttendees.Attendee is in effect a synonym for Member. Correct, I accidentally coded DELETE OnlineMeetingAttendees.Attendee. To my subsequent horror,...
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 2:13 am
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
- Replies: 15
- Views: 18101
Re: NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
Correct, a rule like that s/b only used in a process, and as you suggested, I used that as test. That test proved that the If statement was triggered in the BO, blocking the delete via report error, BUT the PROTECT statement used inside the same IF logic was ignored. In Summary both of these below d...
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:44 am
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
- Replies: 15
- Views: 18101
Re: NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
So, your suggestion of: IF Member.ID <> LoggedInRegular.user.ID THEN REPORT Error 'Testing Rule' worked. the Member was not deleted (good). However... I got no message, and I think this was just intended to see if the rule was run in the Member BO. Looks like it was. However, my original PROTECT cod...
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:01 am
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
- Replies: 15
- Views: 18101
Re: NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
I did change to use the .ID's for the PROTECT, but that did not work. I am thinking Report Error is not normally something you would put in a Business Rule of a BO, since its part BO Rule processing, since it is console related and waits for user input, correct? I am happy to try as a test though......
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:31 am
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
- Replies: 15
- Views: 18101
Re: NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
BO Member is in the SystemUser Business Object Group, along with RegularUser. In my application, Member is at the top of the food chain - the big Kahuna BO. That Business Rule must be bulletproof, and from what I see it is not. If one Member can delete another, then big problem.
Dave
Dave
- Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:00 pm
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
- Replies: 15
- Views: 18101
NOT GOOD - AwareIM let one member delete another
I have this rule in the Member BO. I expected this to prevent the LoggedInMember from deleting another Member. IF Member <> LoggedInMember THEN PROTECT Member from Member In a process I had a rule coded as DELETE OnlineMeetingttendees.Attendee. OnlineMeetingAttendees.Attendee is data type Member. Th...
- Tue Jan 14, 2020 3:30 pm
- Forum: Problem reports
- Topic: Applicable condition in a panel operation has a bug(SOLVED)
- Replies: 0
- Views: 6325
Applicable condition in a panel operation has a bug(SOLVED)
I have an instance in context, and I am using the panel operations above a grid to use a button that runs a process which adds records to the grid. In the "applicable" input box for the panel operaton, where you can enter a valid display filter, I have found this bug: This does not work, but should ...
- Fri Jan 10, 2020 9:39 pm
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: Email proce$$ing not using AwareIM email notifications
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3947
Re: Email proce$$ing not using AwareIM email notifications
That looks to me like the way to go. AWS has a service called SES (Simple Email Exchange) that I believe also has an API. Searching today, I have also seen some other 3rd party application email services as well. I am going to start a POC that replaces my AwareIM email processing with AwareIM proces...
- Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:50 pm
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: Email proce$$ing not using AwareIM email notifications
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3947
Email proce$$ing not using AwareIM email notifications
For Email processing experts, which have an AwareIM app which lives and breathes on incoming email, and email processing in general: I am certainly willing to pay for consulting on this, but only from someone that has an AwareIM app which lives and breathes on incoming email, and email processing in...
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 2:53 pm
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: Calling REST weather service from AwareIM REST Vid (SOLVED)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15838
Re: Calling REST weather service from AwareIM REST Video
Yes, thanks. FYI, in the AwareIM REST API video, a context BO is used as a json context object as a parameter to demonstrate the weather example from openweathermap. Since it is clear that openweathermap uses url string based parameters, the video is incorrect. I had spent many hours trying to get t...
- Wed Jan 08, 2020 11:02 pm
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: Deployed application to AWS not accessible from the web
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3773
Re: Deployed application to AWS not accessible from the web
Yes - I had been working with a consultant today - probably around the same time that you were posting this. He directed me to open up the port on the firewall and that fixed it. Thanks for responding to this.
Dave
Dave
- Wed Jan 08, 2020 7:02 pm
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: Calling REST weather service from AwareIM REST Vid (SOLVED)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15838
Re: Calling REST weather service from AwareIM REST Video
So, I am still confused. In the end, all services, when called pass a URL string, correct? If not, how do I know which ones do and which ones do not. Even in the video for the weatcher, he shows the Body being used, and in the details dialog he defines the context BO.Attribute
- Wed Jan 08, 2020 3:37 pm
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: Deployed application to AWS not accessible from the web
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3773
Deployed application to AWS not accessible from the web
Well, I provisioned an AWS instance, enabled port 80 inbound, installed AwareIM, changed the control panel settings to use port 80, imported, and published my .bsv . The AwareIm Control panel is up and running, and via the output in the control panel, Tomcat's output looks fine. AwareIM correctly co...
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 5:47 pm
- Forum: General discussion and questions about Aware IM
- Topic: Calling REST weather service from AwareIM REST Vid (SOLVED)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15838
Re: Calling REST weather service from AwareIM REST Video
That's correct. In my case, in that dialog (that worked for you for a different service), I used a BO named "WeatherParameter", with the attribute named "parameter". WeatherParameter.parameter s/b in the context because in the calling process I create (and display) it. In my case it never gets appen...
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 5:19 pm
- Forum: Problem reports
- Topic: calling REST service via an object context does not work
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5980
calling REST service via an object context does not work
see
http://awareim.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=11420
Calling using a URL string works, but BO context does not. The BO context object string never gets appended to the base string. I have proved this out.
Dave
http://awareim.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=11420
Calling using a URL string works, but BO context does not. The BO context object string never gets appended to the base string. I have proved this out.
Dave